The walk to school (three poems)


One little old lady 

Little old lady

Topping eighty

Rucksacked

Runs the roads

Faster than I can

(that not to say much)

Towing a little old dog, 

Scrawned in her image

She was a regularity

On our walk to school

Then she was missing,

One month, two

This morning,

Sunbright,

We saw again,

Summer shorts,

No rucksack,

No dog

Evidently, 

He could not keep up

He said to himself

She’ll run for ever

Let her

I’ve had enough

I’m packing in

Another little old lady 

We saw her, 

Constant as Kant on his daily walk

Telling the people of Konigsberg that

When I turn the next corner, the time 

Will be exactly five o’clock

She did not perambulate

Or philosophise, as far 

As we could tell

But she brushed her rooms,

And her garden path, 

And the hedged pavement fronting her home

Aged, not very strong

She tickled and winkled at stray leaves

Shepherding them back under the branches

Ready for the breeze to untidy all her work

What was this old lady doing

Inside this repeated futility?

Suffering Sisyphean punishment

Trapped in demential repetition

Or dignity of habit, 

Keeping her step polished, 

No waning in face of imminent ending,

Faithful in weakness?  

Then we saw her,

Now we don’t,

Yet somehow still

Her path is clear

Twiglet

The boy of two years

Crouched in the hedge

Raises his arm

Straight towards the overlooking mother

Tall at the pavement’s edge

Hand on buggy

In his fist,

A dried twig of splintered pine,

A foot-long upright with two side shoots, 

Making a large F

A finding proffered for maternal admiration,

Insignificance transformed in the grip of attention,

Rubbish made treasure,

By the child’s choosing.

N also walks this pavement

Cheerily to school

Here he has collected conkers in hundreds,

Odd shaped stones,

Rusty washers.

Here he has counted slugs against more numerous snails – 

On this pavement he has been growing up

Through four years

So he edits out mere twigs

Leaving them invisible by acquired indifference

His mind on greater things like Ugio cards

So is this schooled boy now

Slipping down Wordsworth’s slope

To the dull melancholy of adult loss 

Comforted only by vague intimations of immortality?

Faith forbids such fatalistic imposition: 

N and friends day after day

Take up scorched planks

(Left from the shed that nearly set the house afire

When a dustbin melted from the hot ashes it was not made to hold)

Without nails to engineer a den in a tree 

With uncooperatively angled branches

Playing in hope, seeing the invisible.

The stuff is bigger now than a toddler’s twig: 

The spirit, experimental, wondering, hoping, is still the same.

Milton, thou shouldst be living at this hour!

At least you offer an alternative to Wordsworth.

Not the disaster of the ageing individual

But ‘Man’s first disobedience’ and 

death brought into the ‘world’

‘till one greater Man

Restore us and regain the blissful seat’ – 

All this appeared in his ‘advent’rous song’ pursuing

‘things unattempted yet in prose or rhyme’

reaching its end with ‘our grand Parents’ expelled from Paradise,

At which

‘some natural tears they dropp’d, but wiped them soon;

The world was all before them, where to choose

Their place of rest, and Providence their guide. 

They, hand in hand with wand’ring steps and slow,

Through Eden took their solitary way.’

They were like the boy,

Crouching in the hedge, 

The world all before him,

The world in a dessicated splinter

A hand stretched out in giving and receiving

Living the paradox, 

Hand in hand, yet taking a solitary way.  

Adam and Eve grew up quickly,

Sin, guilt, shame, loss is a terrible maker 

Of adults rich with experience – 

Too rich to enter the Kingdom of God. 

Can tears for this disaster be wiped so soon?

Could the expulsion from the Garden be so full of grace, 

That adulthood is given to them as truly childlike being,

So ‘the world is all before them’

Open to their choosing

Within the care of God?  

There is a child in the midst 

Of these fallen men and women, 

Leaving paradise toiled, coiled, soiled, in experience, 

They are lightened by the promised greater Man

Bringing ‘the wholly new thing’ 

to those who ‘have nothing behind them’

‘empty pages’ like the child set in the midst,

tears wiped soon, open to life.1 K Barth  The Christian Life 1981 p 81, in the section on the children, a note on Matt.11.25/Luke 10.21: the revelation is ‘made exclusively to babes’  (who are ‘obviously not to be construed as stupid or muddleheaded people’).   ‘The wholly new thing that has come in Jesus is open only to those people who are an adequate match, who are open to it, because they have nothing behind them, because they are not stopped or blocked up against it by any intellectual, moral, aesthetic, or religious a priori that they have brought with them, because they are empty pages.  This is plainly the point of the story about the child that Jesus set in the midst of his disputing disciples….

…’the fools of Paul are no more [stupid or muddleheaded] than are the babes and children of the Gospels.  What distinguishes them from others is the ability to accept the radical new beginning which is made with men, apart from any enterprise of their own, in the gospel of the Father and the Son, in the Word of the cross.  What distinguishes them is the willingness to begin at this new beginning…’

Notes

  • 1
    K Barth  The Christian Life 1981 p 81, in the section on the children, a note on Matt.11.25/Luke 10.21: the revelation is ‘made exclusively to babes’  (who are ‘obviously not to be construed as stupid or muddleheaded people’).   ‘The wholly new thing that has come in Jesus is open only to those people who are an adequate match, who are open to it, because they have nothing behind them, because they are not stopped or blocked up against it by any intellectual, moral, aesthetic, or religious a priori that they have brought with them, because they are empty pages.  This is plainly the point of the story about the child that Jesus set in the midst of his disputing disciples….

    …’the fools of Paul are no more [stupid or muddleheaded] than are the babes and children of the Gospels.  What distinguishes them from others is the ability to accept the radical new beginning which is made with men, apart from any enterprise of their own, in the gospel of the Father and the Son, in the Word of the cross.  What distinguishes them is the willingness to begin at this new beginning…’

Related posts


Leave a Reply